by Carmen Doyle
If gossip
magazines had been around in the 18th century, Tacumwah would likely
have been one of the “celebrities” whose every move was followed carefully. Tacumwah
was the daughter of an Indian chief and the sister of two chiefs---Pacanne and
Little Turtle. Tacumwah and Pacanne had the same father while Little Turtle and
Tacumwah had the same mother. This meant she was an important Miami woman.
One reason
for her importance was the fact that she and Pacanne traditionally owned and
controlled the Long Portage, an eight mile strip of land between the St. Mary’s
and Wabash Rivers. This joined two water systems “thereby completing a pathway
for commerce that extended from Canada
to the Gulf of Mexico.”(from The History
Center’s website) A portage was a place where the pirogues and the goods
traders had in them were carried from one river to the next. Tacumwah and Pacanne
charged a fee to carry travelers and their goods from one river to the next.
This was extremely profitable. Tacumwah had also inherited money from her
mother so she was very wealthy.
Many of the
traders were French fur traders. Tacumwah married one of them, Joseph
Richardville. Together they had four children including Jean-Baptiste Richardville
(Peshewa, the future Chief Richardville). Joseph Richardville also had children
by other women, but this wasn’t considered a problem. In 1773, after nearly a
decade of marriage, all the Richardville children and Tacumwah were baptized as
Roman Catholic. Tacumwah became Marie-Louisa.
The
marriage did not survive another year.
The
British, authorities in the region because they had the largest military
presence, did not fully trust Joseph Richardville. However, he allied himself
in business with the Masionville brothers, who had been loyal to the British
for decades. The British did not fully trust the Maisonvilles either (because
they were French), but Alexis Maisonville had saved the lives of British
officers during an Indian rebellion. The British did not fully trust the Native
Americans either.
The British
thought the Maisonvilles would be better in charge of the portage than the
Miami, but did not want to give the brothers complete authority over it. What
the British wanted was for the Maisonvilles to maintain the area around the
portage, but actual control over the portage was still given to the Miami, and it was the Miami who made money from the portage.
The
Maisonvilles, with help from Joseph Richardville, eventually grew tired of merely
managing the portage, and decided they wanted complete control over it as well
as the profits. They created a “protection racket” to physically prevent
Pacanne and Tacumwah from carrying goods. Richardville wanted the money from
the portage and the money outweighed any loyalty he had to Tacumwah and their
children. In the ensuing argument, he hit Tacumwah, and she left him, taking refuge
with Charles Beaubien, a business rival of her husband.
A large
scandal resulted. Tacumwah refused to return to her husband and asked Beaubien
to retrieve her things from the house she had shared with Richardville. He
threatened to kill both Tacumwah and Beaubien. Beaubien responded by causing
property damage. Armed, he knocked down Richardville’s garden fence and shouted
threats of violence towards the man.
The ensuing
court case was heard by a British officer from Detroit. A British officer from
Detroit hearing a divorce case involving a Native American woman and her French
husband gives an idea of how complicated politics were at the time. The real
reason a British officer heard the case came down to money. The big issue was
which group should maintain control of the profitable and militarily
significant portage-the French or the Miami.
The divorce
was spiteful. Pacanne accused his sister’s spouse of being lazy and failing to
provide for his family. Pacanne claimed that Richardville had provided for his
sister and her family, by only giving her skins which she traded for rum. The
rum was then sold and the money used to buy needed supplies. It wasn’t unusual
for a Miami man to sit around while his wife worked but British standards
considered a husband not providing for his family unacceptable. Pacanne,
speaking for his sister, invoked British standards in order to win the case and
retain control of the portage.
Richardville
denied that he and Tacumwah were married and attempted to play the victim. He
complained about being threatened by Beaubien and Pacanne. According to Miami customs, once
Tacumwah left him, the marriage was over. However, Richardville used British
customs to try and claim Tacumwah’s wealth, both from the portage and money she
had inherited, and money she had made trading the rum and skins.
The British
in 1774 were divided between reliance on the French settlers and traders and
the Indians in the region. The dilemma then became which group to keep happy in
this divorce case: the Miami or the French. The reliance on the Miami proved
stronger and the British Captain Lernoult decided in favor of Tacumwah. The Miami would retain
control of the portage. To make the Miami even happier, Lernoult took away
management of the portage from the Maisonvilles and gave it to Beaubien, the
man with whom Tacumwah had taken refuge.
Tacumwah
did not speak during the proceedings. Despite her status and intelligence, she
left behind no words of her own. Her biggest legacy was her son, Jean-Baptiste
Richardville, who became Chief Richardville. Chief Richardville inherited the
portage from Tacumwah and she was the person who helped him become chief.
Although
Tacumwah is best remembered as a mother, it is worth remembering that she was
an important person in her own right.
Sources:
Birzer, Bradley J.
French Imperial remnants on the middle ground: The strange case of August de la
Balme and Charles Beaubien. Journal of the Illinois State Historical Society,
Summer 2000.
History Center
website www.fwhistorycenter.com
Marrero, Karen.
"'She is Capable of Doing a Good Deal of Mischief': A Miami Woman's Threat
to Empire in the Eighteenth-Century Ohio Valley". Journal of Colonialism
and Colonial History Volume 6, Number 3, Winter 2005.
No comments:
Post a Comment